💍 Cheaper Isn't Always Better
You and your partner just bought a house or welcomed a new baby. You decide to be responsible and sort out your Life Insurance. The adviser asks: "Do you want a Joint policy or two Single policies?"
You notice the Joint policy is roughly £3 cheaper per month. You think: "Brilliant, let's save some cash."
Stop. That trivial saving could cost your family hundreds of thousands of pounds in coverage later. Here is the trap no one explicitly explains to you.
Joint vs. Single Policies
Let's compare the outcomes in a worst-case scenario (e.g., a fatal accident involving both parents).
| Why Buying 'Joint Life Insurance' is a Huge Mistake |
The "Uninsurable Survivor" Risk
This is the critical risk factor. Imagine you buy a Joint policy at age 30.
🏥 The Timeline
- At age 45, Partner A passes away. The Joint policy pays out and terminates.
- Partner B (now 45) is left with no life cover.
- However, Partner B developed health issues (e.g., diabetes) at age 40. Now, when they try to buy a new policy, it is either declined or prohibitively expensive.
If they had held Single policies, Partner B's original policy (with cheap premiums locked in at age 30) would still be valid.
Chief Editor’s Verdict
For the sake of saving £3 or £4 a month, do not compromise your family's financial security. We strongly recommend buying two separate Single Life policies.
This ensures double the coverage if the worst happens and protects the surviving partner's future insurability. Pro Tip: Write your single policies "In Trust" to ensure the money pays out quickly and outside of probate.
This article provides general information only and does not constitute regulated financial advice. Policy terms vary by provider (e.g., Aviva, Legal & General, Vitality). Prices are estimates based on 2026 market rates. Always consult a qualified Financial Adviser to discuss placing policies in Trust or assessing your specific needs.
0 Comments